Skip to content

AI for your small business, one outcome at a time

Four fixed-scope packages built with the same engineering as our larger projects, priced before we start and measured once they run.

+3 hours
a day recovered at a rental agency that used to check every inquiry by hand
Hundreds
of appointments a month handled on WhatsApp by our own product, running at clinics
€2,500
is where a fixed-scope build starts, with the full ranges published in the pricing guide

The tool lists answer the wrong question

Search “AI for small business” and what comes back is lists. The biggest names in software publish rankings of tools, one for marketing, one for bookkeeping, one more for answering messages. None of it is wrong. It just answers a question you were not asking.

The question that decides whether AI pays in a small business runs the other way around. Not which tools exist, but which of your processes repeats often enough, and costs enough each time, to pay for its own automation. The best AI for a small business is the one attached to that number, and our free tool checks your tasks one at a time to find it.

The official statistics show who is getting that answer right. Eurostat, the statistics office of the European Union, measured that one in five European companies with ten or more employees used AI technologies in 2025, up from 13.5% the year before. Split by company size it stops being one story, 17% of small companies against 55% of large ones.

Large companies are not three times more convinced than you are. They can afford systems built around their own operations, with engineering behind them, and that is the kind of AI that moves a business number. We package the engineering large companies get, for one process at a time and with the price said first.

The difference between using AI and having a system

By August 2025, 58% of small businesses in the United States said they used generative AI, more than double the 23% of two years earlier. The figure comes from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has tracked it since 2023. If your team drafts emails or summarizes documents with a chat tool, you are already in that majority.

That kind of AI helps whoever is holding it, and only while they hold it. A subscription answers when somebody asks, and in a team of five nobody’s job is to sit and ask all day.

A system is a different purchase. It watches the channel where the work arrives, does the task, checks its own output and leaves a record you can audit. A system does not wait to be prompted, and it is measured against a number agreed before it was built.

Most AI software for small business is the first kind, and it is fine at what it does. What we build is the second kind, cut to the size of one process and one result.

Four packages, one outcome each

Each package is scoped to one concrete outcome and quoted at a fixed price before anything starts. These are the four we offer.

  • 24/7 customer service. An agent on WhatsApp or your website that answers the usual requests at any hour, resolves the ones it has been trusted with and hands the rest to your team with the context already gathered.
  • Lead qualification. It holds the first conversation, asks the questions you define and applies your criteria. Your team receives a summary with the reasons, and the final say on every lead stays with a person.
  • Document automation. Invoices, receipts and forms that arrive by chat or email and land as checked rows where your team already works. If that place is a spreadsheet, it stays a spreadsheet.
  • Support and maintenance. Someone watching the system every week and on call when it needs attention. No change ships without passing the test suite first.

Measured at businesses your size

Stanton manages rental properties. The electricity, gas and water bills their tenants sent in were typed into a spreadsheet by hand, a minute each. Today a chat the team already used receives them, a reading layer with a language model turns each one into a checked row in that same spreadsheet and 98% of the bills go through with nobody touching them. The client has kept commissioning more processes since.

Barceloneta Premium rents out apartments in Barcelona and receives dozens of WhatsApp inquiries a day. Checking each one used to take five to ten minutes of somebody’s attention. Now an agent holds the conversation, gathers what the agency needs to know and hands the team an email summary with the reasons already written. The agency got more than three hours a day back.

The third system is our own product. Wazzy books, reschedules and cancels appointments on WhatsApp for clinics, and it handles hundreds of appointments a month. In the entire history of the product, no appointment has ever been double-booked. We run it ourselves, with our own money on the line, which is where the maintenance discipline this page describes was learned.

When we tell you not to buy

Some projects are born from a pain point and some are born from a demo. We wrote about the second kind and called it the shiny toy, the project nobody misses when it is not there, whose gain never had a number and where the AI sits in the headline instead of in the result.

There is also the case where the right answer is simpler than an agent. If your process follows clear rules and nothing in it needs interpreting, conventional automation without a model does the job for less money and with no model to keep an eye on. We build that too, and we say so when it is the better buy.

The shiny toy, told in full →

The price, before you ask

A fixed-scope build falls between €2,500 and €10,000, and keeping it watched and maintained costs between €150 and €500 a month. They are the same ranges we publish for every project, broken down in the pricing guide.

What the model consumes and what the infrastructure costs are not inside that fee. Both run on accounts opened in your company’s name, so those bills arrive at your desk, visible line by line, and never pass through us.

The fee has no lock-in. You pay for the month you get and stop when you decide, and what was built does not switch off that day, because the repository and the infrastructure were yours from the first day.

The pricing guide, range by range →

How a project starts

With one process and one number. Before anything is built we agree what the system should save and how we will measure it, so the decision to extend rests on evidence instead of on enthusiasm.

The first step is a pilot, paid and small, and its price counts toward the final project if you go ahead. With the data, the access and the task well defined, two weeks for that pilot is realistic. When one of the three is missing, we say which one and what it takes to get there, instead of promising a date we do not control.

Questions from small businesses

Is our company too small for this?

What decides it is not headcount, it is whether one process repeats often enough to pay for its own automation. The rental agency and the property manager behind the numbers on this page are small teams.

Do we have to change the tools we use?

No. The work keeps arriving through whatever your team already uses to move it around, and the results land in the files and programs you already open every morning. A tool that forces new habits on a four-person team ends up quietly abandoned.

What does the monthly fee pay for, exactly?

The monitoring and the maintenance of that month: the weekly check in production and someone on call when the system needs attention. Any change has to pass the test suite before it reaches your users.

Our data lives in spreadsheets. Is that a problem?

It is the normal case, not a drawback. The two client systems on this page read from a chat and write to a spreadsheet. What we do check before starting is that the data the process needs exists somewhere at all, because that is the one thing a build cannot invent.

How long until something is running?

Two weeks for the pilot is a realistic figure, with the process chosen, the data reachable and the task defined. It is the real process on your real cases, measured, not a prepared demonstration, so what you decide at the end is backed by your own numbers.

And if it turns out the numbers are not there?

Then you hear it from us before we build, or at worst at the end of the pilot, and stopping there costs you the pilot and not the project. What we will not do is deliver something unmeasured and call it a success.

What would you stop doing by hand first?

Describe the task that repeats most and how often it comes around, and leave the technology to us. We answer within one business day.